Your web browser is out of date. Update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on this site.

Update your browser
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Why do I need workload automation if I already use a job scheduler?

Why do I need workload automation if I already use a job scheduler?

With a job scheduler in place, why would you need workload automation? Learn how workload automation can improve your operations with intelligent workflows.

Ben Adams
Principal Automation Consultant
Temps De Lecture
3 mins
Derniere Mise A Jour
mars 17th, 2022
Partager

You have a job scheduler program that regularly performs background maintenance activities such as a simple database backup or a file cleanup for system optimization. So, with a job scheduler in place, why would you need workload automation software?

The answer is simple. A job scheduler is a rudimentary technology locked into a specific operating system or platform. It performs a single function at a single moment in time, like an alarm clock set to ring once a day. On the other hand, workload automation is an intelligent workflow not limited to a particular operating system or platform.

Cross-platform workload automation works across multiple operating systems, APIs and technologies. Its sophisticated functions enable automated error resolution and coordination across technological platforms, geographies and time zones.

While a job scheduler allows for limited visibility, rarely giving users visibility into past, present, or scheduled workflows, the user interface of workload automation software provides expanded visibility into operations — from a high-level dashboard to drill-down details.

Job scheduling vs. workload automation

One of the most important differences between a job scheduler and workload automation is the ability to automate error resolution. Beyond simply automating your job scheduler, workload automation has a much higher level of intelligence to actively solve problems during task execution.

For example, let’s say you want to backup your database at 2 a.m., but your database backup folder is out of space. A job scheduler will attempt the task and fail when it finds the folder full. It will not complete the task, leaving you to discover the failure in the morning — or to receive a late-night call from a panicked employee.

By contrast, if you run workload automation, the system will kick off an error recovery workflow to expand the available drive space on the server. Then, it will try the task again and continue to iterate the server expansion step until it opens up enough space to complete the backup job. The workload automation solves the problem using intelligent workflows so that you can arrive in the morning with the task completed.

Returning back to the analogy of the alarm clock, the job scheduler is like a typical radio alarm clock. It plays whatever radio station it’s tuned to, even if that station produces dead air. If the clock is enhanced with workload automation, it will detect the silence and automatically change the channel to something that can actually wake you up.

How does workload automation consolidate procedures?

Workload automation acts as an automation integration point with your operating systems, APIs, scripts, databases and technologies. The single, point-of-control workflow orchestration consolidates redundant procedures by tying operations together and putting everyone and every technology on the same page.

Suppose your enterprise has multiple sites or teams that need to perform versions of the same workflow. In that case, the workload automation provides an instrumental record of activity you can leverage to facilitate the procedure across multiple sites or platforms. As a result, you can abstract all of the complexity of a multi-step process into a single-button click.

With powers like this, it’s clear why workload automation adds robust enhancements beyond the simple abilities of a job scheduler.

Comparing capabilities: job scheduling vs. workload automation

Job Scheduler

Workload Automation

Locked into a specific technology

Job schedulers tend to be tied to a specific platform and do not work across other platforms easily.

Technologically agnostic

Permits automation of workflows across multiple operating systems, APIs and technologies.

Performs rigid execution of a workflow

It is limited to either a “pass” or “fail” functionality.

Provides adaptable, responsive workflows

Leverages the ability to create dynamic error fixes and automate error resolution with little or no human interaction.

Limited visibility

Only schedulers with access can view workflows that ran yesterday, are running today, and are scheduled to run tomorrow.

Expanded visibility across all departments or technologies. Modern Workload Automation platforms provide high-level dashboards across the whole environment with the ability to drill down into the details as necessary.



Vous avez une question sur l'automatisation ? Nous aimerions avoir de vos nouvelles.

Envoyez-nous un message et quelqu'un vous contactera dès que possible.
<!--[if lte IE 8]> <script charset="utf-8" type="text/javascript" src="//js.hsforms.net/forms/v2-legacy.js"></script> <![endif]--> <script charset="utf-8" type="text/javascript" src="//js.hsforms.net/forms/v2.js"></script> <script> hbspt.forms.create({ portalId: "7300903", formId: "86bdd128-9fa3-435a-9895-ed54b0159345" }); </script>